|
|
|
Return-to-Home Policy: Homogeneity
Principle Is the Issue |
|
The situation in Israel/Palestine is not merely a bi-national problem; it is an omni-state, international problem. The issue is not merely the re-possessing of a land—the fake-Jews never had legitimate standing to claim a return, or a government demanding a racially and culturally homogeneous constitution and population (in part, a God-designed civilization concept, in contrast to anti-democratic, anti-theocratic and anti-Christian, man-invented government), but rather the morality of such government constitution for Israel as a resolve for the Mideast demographic conflict, and for the Gentile nations the international re-establishment of descendants of the founders of civilized lands and repatriation of the non-homogeneous (non-founding) peoples, versus the lack of morality toward establishing interglobal demographic homogeneity among the nations with inferior segregational goals and constitutions, constituents of anarchy and disestablishment. Paradoxically, the Jewish, goy Talmudicist plays simultaneously the role of the aggressor of an aggregate of both ideologies--the cultural (however, not tribal) segregationist in Israel and the anarchist in the Gentile land. The moral resolve for the Mideast conflict does not appertain merely to nations siding with either Israel or Palestine, but rather establishing similar moral constitutions and demo-topographics among themselves. It is evident that the UN and other national conglomerates are unjust. Sharon's theft (at least according to a previous agreement) of land and murdering continued. Due to Israel's superior military force, Arab citizens could not defend themselves sufficiently against Sharon's aggression. International nations (those related to the United Nations) can not justifiably (if impartiality and integrity is to be anticipated with their laws) allow repetitious massacre type of racial attacks, which are war crimes. Regardless, passive tolerance of the taking of lives, and land theft according to the previous UN outline gave Sharon the international right to mass murder for the achievement of land expansion--a grave deficiency and negligence factor in the United Nations or political, national official organizations that have been involved in the Mideast situation. Not only did he murder with helicopters and high-tech equipment against perhaps not even stone-throwing Arabs, but then openly steal, bulldoze, and build new homes for the advancement of real estate for the Israeli citizen. Perhaps, the situation might be analyzed differently if the Jewish were Hebrews, but they are not. Nevertheless, the Palestinian Muslims have no biblical warrant to live there, and the Jewish don't have a demographic inheritance to the land according to the law of Moses (Numbers 36:5-13). Nevertheless, God does have a plan and a future for Israel. Many huge governing unions such as the UN were established in the last century. All of them have failed because of the misperception or ignorance of God-given land or wisdom. If a governing body does not take in account the morality and necessity of homogeneous population and homogeneous constitution, how can fairness among the races ever be achieved? The things concerning physical identity and the prevention of racial calamity must be admitted. According to laws of the United Nations, even though many of their laws, if not the aggregate, are certainly not agreed to by Christians, Herzl Matrilinealists (Jewish people) or many nations, Sharon had no more right than Saddam Hussein to commit aggression and war crime against other people or another nation. Even though the Palestinians are generally an anti-white if not anti-other-Gentile, pro-Palestinian Semitic, anti-Christian, heretic, Mohammed following cult, they have not received the expected protection of the formerly involved nations against the tyrannical mistreatment or atrocity from the fabricated and feigned, pro-Israeli Semitic, similarly, anti-white and anti-Gentile, anti-Christian, heretic, impostor and cult nation of Talmudicism, Israel. However, not only the Palestinians, but the other entire Gentile people, Nordish, Spanish, Chinese, Italian, etc., have interests in the Mideast and are also neglected by the leading Israeli officials. They are not brutally and militarily enforced out of the way by Israel as the Palestinians, but rather generally disregarded. Except for only an external part, the non-Semitic nations' spiritual leaders, among others, are left out of the land (real estate and superiority/sovereignty) argument views currently going on now. Selfishly, Israel is openly refusing to accept or authorize a right of significant address to the non-proposed-Semitic nations amidst the conflict. However, perhaps to their disappointment, the general Gentile nations' role of inheritance and distribution must be viewed and counted to establish equity in the land. On the other hand, to the advantage and toward the establishment of fairness of all parties through respect of racial and cultural homogeneity (as a basic intimate right of all people), in appointing the joint role of inheritance judgment among the non-proposed-Semitic nations along with the Khazar or non-fully-Semitic, and Semitic peoples of Israel and Palestine, and the international political execution of sectoring of co-existing homogeneous races and cultures, a world interest dispute may be resolved. An amicable return-to-home or leave-to-designated home policy to prevent devastating ethnic cleansing and genocide is suggested not only as a regional resolve for the Mideast, but for a world and international method of protective isolation for small and large nations alike. Contemporary Israel and Palestine both have their own views on the land ownership; however, the Biblical, pre-delimited borders are authoritative. (See Obadiah.) In order for such a newly appointed international administration of homogeneous racial and cultural appropriation to be incorporated and establish an effective policy, many nations would have to be willing to allow and encourage their peoples to divide in an equitable way (perhaps through financial methods or other methods alleviating or accounting and reimbursing for dispossession) so as to establish racially and culturally, not just racially, homogeneous populations. It is grievous for Talmudicists to live with Moslems; it is grievous for Christians to live with Catholics; it is grievous for people of one religion to live with people of another religion. It is even more difficult to separate different cultures among racially homogeneous populations (although hopefully not impossible). Theoretically, it can be accomplished through willing peoples with a tendency for demographic and democratic diplomacy with a moral respect for natural affinity and human dignity. The institution of homogeneous population lands through world-individual agreement to avoid the affliction of mixed races and conflict would be a better political resolve than wars. For instance, this is just one idea. I am sure people can think of other very good ways to separate and appropriate (re-distribute) equity. Here goes! Everyone's assessed equity and digital genealogical records could be put into a computer. Then the demographical results of each nation, state, district, or homogeneous population entity could be calculated and printed out for every individual. Moving is always work, but without work, nothing gets done. Compared to the costs and troubles of riots, military violence, or war, or slow-death-ethnic-cleansing that leads to racial genocide through captivity and oppression of the fair races, and even some of the other races, digital, homogeneous, real estate planning would be much less expensive. Besides, those who had enough equity would not necessarily be required to move, only those who lived in areas not designated to their race or have too little money or equity to live in the same home after the distribution. The results would be well worth it. No matter what the trouble or cost, as a trend of nature, the people of most honorable nations generally prefer to be self-dependent among their own kind anyway! I know it seems a little far fetched, but the worst thing about government without a homogeneous (protective isolation) constitution is that genocide results from within the founders' descendants' country. What could be a worse death trap than that? Changes made in the USA government in the direction of the founders' plans ... state rights, not federal usurpation ... to avoid oppression of the descendants of the founders ... to abolish non-homogeneous immigration and re-colonize, to abolish the current Affirmative Action lawlessnesses and other genocidal strangleholds, ... to keep the country and union of states out of direct international affairs ... anti-globalism, can only be for the better, not for the worse. This would take shocking economic and geographical adjustments in many civilized nations. For instance, see a projection for the United States at this site. The Reconstruction was a tyranny in the South after the Civil War, but once the indigenous people overturned their oppressors and re-gained control of their government to some degree, great blessing happened. That is what the suffering, disenfranchised white man needs today in the USA--to regain a vital control of his government. Other countries and peoples should make changes for their posterity also in a similar way: providing first of all things a moral, segregation constitution by willing, racially unified (sincerely democratic), political adjustment and intervention that would prevent invasion, slaughter, or even worse, passive slow death through miscegenation and oppression. The role of the woman as a heroine, denying her own material or contemporary desires, and forwarding her will and vote toward her fair race's desovereignized and unjustly dispossessed, opposite sex may be a decisive element concerning White destiny. Semitic homogeneity, sovereignty and rule over its Herzl Matrilinealists (some dispute the trace to Khazars) or political adherents must also be established in Israel if the cultural bond is more important than the deportation of its non-fully-Semitic peoples. However, as a rule, different races do not co-exist among each other very well. In order for an international political administration to oversee such equity among so many nations or at least a group of nations (but without usurping power against national, state, district or homogeneous population independence) in a religious, racial conflict as this, it must include at least some men of Biblical knowledge and faith: men who believe in Ezran doctrine, and Old Testament fulfillment precepts of the New Testament. To the contrary, men who openly contradict both the Old Testament and the New Testament, God's authority and direction, by their spoken opinion, such as the infuriating, self-hating, vote-getter-type, official Sen. Kennedy, for instance, or his fellow God's-wrath-bringing Conyers, or reprobates, do not have the ability or a qualifying place to officiate a dispute that concerns ministers of races and religions that have spoken obligation in at least some respect in a general sense for the authority of the Old Testament. The situation is an invitation for direction in international and national affairs from God-fearing men. No doubt the erroneous, and actually non-deserving, Pope of Rome would like to be considered worthy of such repute and honor, but he is only one religious leader among the many non-Jewish Gentile nations. There are numerous, deserving, protestant men among the many nations that also have an interest in this international conflict--ministers of over one hundred nations should be appointed unto the non-Semitic party among the two proposed-Semitic parties concerning racial inheritance judgment. What can we expect in the future? Eschatology |
Links:
Modern Israel's Deceptive Law of Return
|
Download Now!
Sermons
Videos |